More rules

[Akina]

I think helping banned members get back into the forum should be against the rules along with breaking the peace treaty.

[xtommyx]

Yeah - me too

[experiment622]

Yea, same here..

[stitchgirl]

yeah

[Akina]

I remember one person helped a banned member get back into the forum, multiple times too. That's bothered me ever since then.

[Wilson]

agreed!

[xtommyx]

Mhmm >>; No mooses on Angel D<

[Akina]

xtommyx said:

Mhmm >>; No mooses on Angel D<

Or Ichigos, or......you get the point ;

In my opinion I think helping a banned member get back can be pretty serious, depending on who is sneaking in. If it's like an art theif maybe a warning, then 15% warn level and then a ban? If their like a huge basher/trouble maker I think there should be, I dunno, 45%? ^^;; (I'm bad at warn level decisions). But if they are a long term member and knew how/why the person got banned they should just be given the warn level. Is that about good? Or too harsh?

[chris]

I support this. It would definitely make A good rule. After all, it took alot of work to get that peace treaty finished, so we should enforce it the best we can.

[Akina]

chris said:

I support this. It would definitely make A good rule. After all, it took alot of work to get that peace treaty finished, so we should enforce it the best we can.

Good point. I think this rule would also depend on how severe the offense is. A little comment, a warning, then warn level (5-15% maybe? ) and then ze ban. If it's some full blown rant or thread and the person knows they shouldnt be doing that then a somewhat high warn level and maybe a short term ban and then a perma ban?? I'm not sure, I'm really bad with punishment deciding

[Akuroma]

-nod-

I agree. =3

You guys have said everything else I would;ve. xD

[Teh Knight]

anela said:

chris said:

I support this. It would definitely make A good rule. After all, it took alot of work to get that peace treaty finished, so we should enforce it the best we can.

Good point. I think this rule would also depend on how severe the offense is. A little comment, a warning, then warn level (5-15% maybe? ) and then ze ban. If it's some full blown rant or thread and the person knows they shouldnt be doing that then a somewhat high warn level and maybe a short term ban and then a perma ban?? I'm not sure, I'm really bad with punishment deciding

No Kina, I think that's perfectly appropriate.

[Bodie]

Agreed.

[Experiment 271]

I think these rules should be added and enforced. They are great rules and they would also do good for the forum.